First, the film. American Sniper is, at it's heart, an action movie. Seth Rogen famously called it propaganda but it is really just a run-of-the-mill action movie. It feels hastily put-together and rushes through what should be important parts in Kyle's development. That being said, it does what the best films of its kind do right, namely, putting the battle between the life lived in service and the live lived back at home at the forefront. Kyle, compelled to enlist after seeing the twin towers fall on September 11, 2001, leaves behind his wife, played by Sienna Miller, and children to lay prone on top of crumbling buildings in Iraq to lay cover fire for his fellow servicemen. By the end of his first tour, Kyle has earned the nickname "Legend" among his brothers in arms and has become a god among men. We see Kyle and his squadron as they attempt to gain intelligence on a local warlord known as the Butcher, all the while dodging RPG's and the long range bullets of a very lethal sniper in his own right whom Kyle sees as his own personal mission to eliminate, even at the expense of going off-mission. The film is about determination and obsession and hero worship. Kyle says at one point, "The only thing that haunts me is all the guys I couldn't save." He's explaining to a therapist and himself and the audience that he has no regrets. It's hard to not imagine Eastwood himself playing Kyle if he were 40 years younger, stoically grimacing through the entire affair. Is it worth a $100 million opening weekend? Probably not. But the film itself isn't the only reason it became such a behemoth.
Which brings us to the controversies.
As previously noted, there are three versions of the Chris Kyle story. The film is, frankly, a watered down, cleaned up version of the man's life. That fact should not be held against Eastwood and Cooper, as the abridging of an autobiography for the big screen is a common tactic. However, that glossing over of some of the more controversial aspects of Kyle's life has, in itself, turned into a controversy. It seems that the film has become a litmus test for ones political beliefs, with patriotic right wingers applauding the film as a piece of good old fashioned patriotic filmmaking and liberals complaining that the film glamorizes a war and a soldier, in particular a soldier who is a long-range sniper, which Michael Moore this week called a "cowardly" act, in a way that signifies American imperialism and American warmongering. There have been many blog entries and articles about the lies and lessons that the film is supposedly telling us dumb, impressionable American viewers but I'm fairly certain that nobody is coming into a viewing of this film with a blank slate, you've already made up your mind by now. The only thing to discuss is your already formed opinion. Eastwood has said that the film is not meant to be taken as a political statement but it's hard to separate the man and his well documented statements as a conservative Republican from his work.* A secondary aspect of the controversy that has followed the film is it's surprise appearance on the Oscar ballot, perhaps in lieu of the MLK biopic Selma. While both American Sniper and Selma were both nominated for Best Picture, David Oleyowo's name was absent on the Best Actor in a Leading Role ballot while Cooper's name surprisingly snuck in. The lack of diversity on the ballot this year^ happened at the exact time that the American Sniper hysteria was reaching a full boil and the film was in due course roped into the conversation; a film about a white man of questionable moral fortitude who killed hundreds of people achieving more acclaim than a film about the most important civil rights advocate in American history. Not to mention that the film's director, a black woman, was also absent from the list of Best Director nominees (as was Eastwood). Normally, awards show quibbles are meaningless but when the topic of race is at such a forefront in the national consciousness, this type of oversight becomes an issue. The final aspect of this whole story is the fact that {SPOILER} Chris Kyle was murdered in 2013 by a fellow veteran at a shooting range. The man, Eddie Ray Routh, suffered from PTSD and shot and killed Kyle and another veteran at a shooting range in Texas and led police on a car chase before being caught and confessing to the crimes. Routh is currently awaiting a trial in February where a jury will determine if he was sane or not at the time of the shooting. The problem is, the Kyle legend has become such a big story, both to local Texans and because of the book and film that prosecutors believe the trial may become tainted. It's rare that a major legal trial and a mainstream film based on the true events of that case run into each other at the same time like this. After the film's theatrical run is winding down and after the Oscar's are handed out, the results of the trial will again add a new twist in this complex, strange story.
Perhaps the only winner of this entire story is Hollywood. For an R-Rated movie to make $100 million in it's opening weekend in the barren wasteland of January is a major win for the industry. It won't win any Academy Awards but the fact that the film even made it into the conversation is interesting in itself. Recent films treading similar subjects in the same war such as The Hurt Locker are better but the film is still worth watching. If anything, Bradley Cooper is in top form and Clint Eastwood is still proving that he can make a big action movie with the best of 'em. Go see it and then do some reading, I'm interested in seeing where everyone lands on this.
*The fact that an 84 year old man directed two major motion pictures this year is, in itself, something that should be noted. While American Sniper has turned into a major success, Eastwood's Four Seasons biopic Jersey Boys was somewhat of a flop earlier this year.
^All twenty actors nominated this year are white, a statistic that, while probably a big picture problem, only adds to the confusion of some of the nominations this year, in my opinion.





